//연구원논문
연구원논문2017-02-16T16:22:18+00:00

이원적 의료체계에서 의사와 한의사의 과실판단

작성자
의료정책연구소
작성일
2012-04-16 10:25
조회
1363
이원적 의료체계에서 의사와 한의사의 과실판단
The Criteria of Medical Malpractice of Medical Doctors and Oriental Medical Doctors in Korea

연구자 : 이백휴
학술지 : 의료법학 제12권제2호
발행처 : 대한의료법학회
발행년도 : 2011

【차 례】
Ⅰ. 들어가는 말
Ⅱ. 이원적 의료체계와 의료과실 판단 기준
1. 의료행위와 한방의료행위 구분
2. 의료과실의 판단기준
3. 의료과실 판단의 실제
Ⅲ. 상대 직역 의료지식 인지의무(認知義務) 부과의 타당성
1. 서언
2. 주요 판례의 내용
3. 상대 직역의 의료지식 인지 여부
Ⅳ. 의료주체의 재량권의 한계
1. 서언
2. 재량에 상응한 의무 부과
3. 의무부과 사례
4. 소결
Ⅴ. 맺음말

ABSTRACT

The Korea health care system has been divided into Western and Oriental (Korea traditional) medicine since 1951. In accordance with dualistic medical system, there are many conflict cases between medical doctors and oriental medical doctors.
Meanwhile, there were much discussions about the meaning and criteria of medical malpractice(negligence). Especially, many cases have been built up about the criteria of medical malpractice through lawsuits. But, comparatively, there s few the medical malpractice case of the oriental medical doctors. According to a recent ruling of the Supreme Court, the legal principles of medical doctor s malpractice case are equally applied to the criteria of the oriental medical doctor s malpractice case.
But there are much considerations in addition to these principles for the dualistic medical system and academic distinctiveness. This study is intended to review the dualistic medical system, the criterion of medical malpractice, and analysis this issues. To make long story short, under our dualistic medical system, judging the medical and oriental malpractice should be considered relatively. However, it makes sense that we want medical doctor or oriental medical doctor to demand the reinforced negligence to restrict the unnecessary discretion. If there is lack of evidence-based medicine or the rationality suspected, the health care providers must give enough proof.